Naresh ji perhaps did not understand the question asked by the SSSC MTS candidate, and today, we will try in our own way—by speaking slowly and clearly—to explain it. Naresh ji, the candidate's question was (let’s take myself as an example): I have applied for the SSC MTS (Multi-Tasking Staff) exam, and the person who will be writing on my behalf—called a writer or more formally an amanuensis or scribe in English—is someone else. Now, suppose Munna Lal Bharti is the candidate appearing for the SSC MTS exam, and his writer/scribe is someone who has also applied for the SSC CGL (Combined Graduate Level) exam. Now carefully listen to the candidate’s question, calmly and attentively. The scribe has filled the CGL form, so the candidate wants to know: Can that person who has filled the SSC CGL form act as a scribe for the SSC MTS exam? They want to understand if someone who is also a candidate for a different SSC exam (in this case, SSC CGL) can legally and properly be the scribe for someone in the SSC MTS exam—especially for someone with a 9% disability (not their own, but the person for whom they’re writing). Now logically, if both exams are on the same date, then of course, the scribe can’t give both the exams and write for someone else at the same time. But if the exams are on different dates, it might be possible. So the real question from the candidate (named Yogendra ji) is: "I have applied for SSC MTS. My scribe has applied for SSC CGL. Can that person still be my scribe during my main exam?" You see, these are different posts—MTS and CGL—so there is confusion. Naresh ji, you often talk about the process of providing scribes. So where has your understanding gone now? Why can’t you understand this simple question? There is no issue in the audio either—it’s clear and audible. So where are you lost? Please listen carefully to the question and respond calmly and clearly. This is not about the past—this is a live and real concern. Pay attention.
